Mike Jay finds tracks, describes which areas in Oregon are best for Bigfoot research
Account
The writer reports finding a long stretch of barefoot footprints in deep dust on a logging road off the main thoroughfare in the Scott Creek area during a deer outing about ten years earlier. The prints were described as only slightly larger than human feet but with width disproportionate to length, no arch, and toes out of line, traits the writer associates with Sasquatch prints. The writer notes the prints could have been human, joking that would have required someone walking barefoot in an October rainstorm.
What was reported
Every kind of observation in the account. Select one to find other encounters with it.
Physical traces
Facts & provenance
Each value names where it came from.
| Place |
McKenzie Bridge, Lane County, Oregon
Stated
Oregon Bigfoot report #282
· Oregon Bigfoot report, labelled fields: County, Nearest Town, Nearest Road
|
|---|---|
| Map point |
44.1751, -122.1639 (± 15 km)
USGS GNIS populated place 'McKenzie Bridge', Lane, matched from nearest town 'McKenzie Bridge'
|
| Account type |
First-hand
|
| Witnesses |
1
Derived
Oregon Bigfoot report #282
· Oregon Bigfoot report, “Description” section
· read with 80% confidence
|
| Witness was |
chasing deer
|
| First published by |
The Track Record
|
Evidence & investigation
What the source says was found or done. Claimed evidence is listed as claimed; the Anomadex has not examined it.
70-80 yards of barefoot footprints slightly larger than human in deep dust on logging road
Measurements: 70 or 80 yards' worth, scarcely-larger-than-human-sized
Investigators were active in the county for several years but found little data.
Source timeline
Every record this entry is built from, earliest known first. Records are versioned and never edited in place.
-
Oregon Bigfoot report #282 Secondary
The report refers to
- “another set of reports for interested readers”Not in the Anomadex yet