Class B First-hand BFRO #10422

Local family reports huge tracks near Big Cedar

February 2005 day Big Cedar, Le Flore County, Oklahoma 2 witnesses

Account

The witness and a relative visited a roadside site east of Big Cedar after hearing that a road crew found large tracks there. They reported seeing many large tracks that looked real to them and took photographs. Investigators later visited the site and found only two badly weathered impressions.

Summary drafted by AI from the source report and checked by code before I publish it. The witness's own words remain with the publisher — read the original report .

What was reported

Every kind of observation in the account. Select one to find other encounters with it.

Physical traces

Facts & provenance

Each value names where it came from.

Date
February 2005
Stated BFRO report #10422 · BFRO report, labelled fields: Year, Month
Time of day
day
Stated BFRO report #10422 · BFRO report, “Time And Conditions” section · read with 70% confidence
Place
Big Cedar, Le Flore County, Oklahoma
Stated BFRO report #10422 · BFRO report, labelled fields: State, County, Nearest Town, Nearest Road
Map point
34.65, -94.58 (± 1000 m)
Stated BFRO map layer · BFRO published map layer · read with 85% confidence
BFRO map layer point for report 10422 (3 decimals, no boundary)
Account type
First-hand
Stated BFRO report #10422 · BFRO report, “Observed” section
Witnesses
2
Derived BFRO report #10422 · BFRO report, “Observed” section
Witness was
inspecting reported tracks
Derived BFRO report #10422 · BFRO report, “Observed” section
Source classification
Class B
Stated BFRO report #10422 · BFRO classification label

Evidence & investigation

What the source says was found or done. Claimed evidence is listed as claimed; the Anomadex has not examined it.

Tracks

Many large adult tracks with possible juvenile tracks, later reduced to two weathered right-foot impressions

Measurements: 16 1/2" long and approximately 8" across at the ball of the foot. The stride was measured at 72''.

BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section
Photograph

A relative took photographs of the tracks and the family later gave negatives to investigators to develop

BFRO report, “Observed” section
Cast

Investigators made a cast of a partial weathered print after the family left

BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section
Tracks

Investigators met the witness family at Big Cedar, examined two weathered tracks near the river, recorded measurements, and cast a partial print.

BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section
Cast

Investigators met the witness family at Big Cedar, examined two weathered tracks near the river, recorded measurements, and cast a partial print.

BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section
Photograph

Investigators met the witness family at Big Cedar, examined two weathered tracks near the river, recorded measurements, and cast a partial print.

BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section
Measurement

Investigators met the witness family at Big Cedar, examined two weathered tracks near the river, recorded measurements, and cast a partial print.

BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section
Follow-up

Investigators met the witness family at Big Cedar, examined two weathered tracks near the river, recorded measurements, and cast a partial print.

BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section

Source timeline

Every record this entry is built from, earliest known first. Records are versioned and never edited in place.

  1. Published 2005-01-30 Retrieved 2026-09-24 Version 1 4 images at source Hash 6bf1d316100f
    BFRO - Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization
  2. BFRO map layer Reference
    Retrieved 2026-09-24 Version 1 Hash cfb8a3d423b7
    BFRO - Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization

The report refers to