Class A First-hand BFRO #26065

California BFRO researcher has sighting with a thermal imaging unit in Wenatchee National Forest

18 August 2007 close to midnight Naches, Yakima County, Washington 1 witness

Account

Shortly before midnight during a multi-camp expedition, the witness borrowed a handheld thermal imager to look for the cause of a branch break near camp. Through the imager he watched a large unclothed human-like figure partly behind a tree about 30-50 yards away for over two minutes as it moved its head, dropped to the ground, crawled and gestured, then stood motionless with its back to him. He left to get recording equipment, but the figure was gone when another researcher checked moments later.

Summary drafted by AI from the source report and checked by code before I publish it. The witness's own words remain with the publisher — read the original report .

What was reported

Every kind of observation in the account. Select one to find other encounters with it.

Described appearance

In the source's own words, field by field. Hover a field's marker to see where it was read.

Height src
close to 7 ft (maybe 6'9 or 6'8)
Build src
about 3 times total body mass of 6-foot-3 170-lb man, 475 to 575 lbs, massive torso and shoulders
Arms src
exaggerated length, hanging to knees or further
Hands src
large, almost fisted, five spread digits visible on left hand
Legs src
fairly long but not particularly bulky
Posture src
predominantly bipedal but dropped to all fours, knees down
Apparent sex src
likely male
Age / size src
young adult (witness opinion)
Clothing src
none, void of any clothing
Other features src
no visible neck, smallish-rounder head, no discernable sagittal crest

Facts & provenance

Each value names where it came from.

Date
18 August 2007
Stated BFRO report #26065 · BFRO report, labelled fields: Year, Month, Date
Time of day
close to midnight
Stated BFRO report #26065 · BFRO report, “Observed” section
Place
Naches, Yakima County, Washington
Stated BFRO report #26065 · BFRO report, labelled fields: State, County, Nearest Town, Location Details, Nearest Road
Map point
46.85, -121.25 (± 20 km)
Stated BFRO map layer · BFRO published map layer · read with 85% confidence
BFRO map layer point for report 26065 with published boundary
Account type
First-hand
Stated BFRO report #26065 · BFRO report, “Observed” section
Witnesses
1
Derived BFRO report #26065 · BFRO report, “Other Witnesses” section
Figures reported
1
Stated BFRO report #26065 · BFRO report, “Observed” section
Witness was
attending expedition camp and scouting with handheld thermal imager
Stated BFRO report #26065 · BFRO report, “Observed” section
Witness's word for it
subject
Stated BFRO report #26065 · BFRO report, “Observed” section
Source classification
Class A
Stated BFRO report #26065 · BFRO classification label

Evidence & investigation

What the source says was found or done. Claimed evidence is listed as claimed; the Anomadex has not examined it.

Investigated by
Bart Cutino (BFRO)
Tracks

Unimpressive foot impression in wet pine-needle duff where subject stood, plus disturbed ground where it moved on ground; no cast due to substrate and overnight rain

Measurements: stepped over small foot-deep berm

BFRO report, “Observed” section
Measurement

Night-of distance estimation by pacing from witness position to initial tree

Measurements: about 150 ft (50 yds)

BFRO report, “Observed” section
Measurement

Later exact measurement showing initial distance and closer majority viewing distance

Measurements: 50 yds initial, 32-33 yds majority

BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section
Measurement

About an hour after the encounter another researcher stood where the subject stood while the witness directed him to estimate distance by pacing.

BFRO report, “Observed” section
Tracks

The next day in daylight researchers found a foot impression and disturbed ground where the subject moved but made no cast due to wet pine-needle substrate.

BFRO report, “Observed” section
Measurement

Years later the witness returned with another investigator for a daylight reconstruction and walk-through to measure distances.

BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section
Follow-up

About an hour after the encounter another researcher stood where the subject stood while the witness directed him to estimate distance by pacing.

BFRO report, “Observed” section
Follow-up

The next day in daylight researchers found a foot impression and disturbed ground where the subject moved but made no cast due to wet pine-needle substrate.

BFRO report, “Observed” section
Follow-up

Years later the witness returned with another investigator for a daylight reconstruction and walk-through to measure distances.

BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section

Source timeline

Every record this entry is built from, earliest known first. Records are versioned and never edited in place.

  1. Published 2009-05-30 Retrieved 2026-09-24 Version 1 11 images at source Hash cb2593d16a0a
    BFRO - Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization
  2. BFRO map layer Reference
    Retrieved 2026-09-24 Version 1 Hash cfb8a3d423b7
    BFRO - Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization

The report refers to

  • “several documented sightings nearby within the BFRO database”
    Not in the Anomadex yet