Class B First-hand BFRO #29313

Fisherman finds possible footprints near Grassy Lake (w/photo)

4 April 2010 afternoon Mayflower, Faulkner County, Arkansas 2 witnesses

Account

Last spring the witness was fishing in the afternoon and found unusual tracks, which were photographed with size references. The tracks led into an area blocked by two creeks, then turned and went back out. The next day the witness's dog picked up scent at the tracks and then fled back to the car, appearing frightened. Another person fishing in the area also reported seeing the tracks.

Summary drafted by AI from the source report and checked by code before I publish it. The witness's own words remain with the publisher — read the original report .

What was reported

Every kind of observation in the account. Select one to find other encounters with it.

Physical traces

Facts & provenance

Each value names where it came from.

Date
4 April 2010
Stated BFRO report #29313 · BFRO report, labelled fields: Year, Month, Date
Time of day
afternoon
Stated BFRO report #29313 · BFRO report, “Time And Conditions” section
Place
Mayflower, Faulkner County, Arkansas
Stated BFRO report #29313 · BFRO report, labelled fields: State, County, Nearest Town, Location Details, Nearest Road
Map point
34.9662, -92.4267 (± 15 km)
Geocoded BFRO report #29313 · gazetteer:place · read with 50% confidence
Census 2023 Gazetteer centroid of Mayflower city (GEOID 0544750), matched from nearest town 'mayflower'
Account type
First-hand
Stated BFRO report #29313 · BFRO report, “Observed” section
Witnesses
2
Derived BFRO report #29313 · BFRO report, “Other Witnesses” section · read with 65% confidence
Witness was
fishing
Stated BFRO report #29313 · BFRO report, “Observed” section
Source classification
Class B
Stated BFRO report #29313 · BFRO classification label

Evidence & investigation

What the source says was found or done. Claimed evidence is listed as claimed; the Anomadex has not examined it.

Investigated by
Ron Boles (BFRO)
Tracks

weird tracks with large toe print and no arch that entered dead-ended area by two creeks then turned around

Measurements: wider than my size 12 water boot but only 2/3 the length

BFRO report, “Observed” section
Photograph

pictures of right and left tracks with objects for size reference

BFRO report, “Observed” section
Measurement

investigator-recorded print size

Measurements: approx. 9 inches long and approx. 6 inches wide

BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section
Tracks

An investigator contacted the witness by phone, reviewed emailed track photos with peers, then visited the site to examine soil consistency and record print size.

BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section
Photograph

An investigator contacted the witness by phone, reviewed emailed track photos with peers, then visited the site to examine soil consistency and record print size.

BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section
Measurement

An investigator contacted the witness by phone, reviewed emailed track photos with peers, then visited the site to examine soil consistency and record print size.

BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section
Photograph

The witness showed track photos to medical professionals and bear hunters who said the tracks were not made by a person or a bear.

BFRO report, “Observed” section
Follow-up

An investigator contacted the witness by phone, reviewed emailed track photos with peers, then visited the site to examine soil consistency and record print size.

BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section
Follow-up

The witness showed track photos to medical professionals and bear hunters who said the tracks were not made by a person or a bear.

BFRO report, “Observed” section

Source timeline

Every record this entry is built from, earliest known first. Records are versioned and never edited in place.

  1. Published 2011-05-31 Retrieved 2026-09-25 Version 1 1 image at source Hash a556a68aaecd
    BFRO - Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization