Class B Investigator summary BFRO #689

Witnesses heard what they described as a "roaring scream"

21 July 1999 8:30 p.m. Marion County, Oregon 3 witnesses

Account

Two people fishing from a dock in the evening heard a powerful roaring scream from the west along the lake. About half a minute later a fisherman came running from the direction of the sound, appearing panicked. The two joined him and all three ran together back to the nearby campground, where he said something had been right next to him. They then broke camp and drove home.

Summary drafted by AI from the source report and checked by code before I publish it. The witness's own words remain with the publisher — read the original report .

What was reported

Every kind of observation in the account. Select one to find other encounters with it.

Sounds

Facts & provenance

Each value names where it came from. 1 field has conflicting values, shown below rather than hidden.

Date
21 July 1999
Stated BFRO report #689 · BFRO report, labelled fields: Year, Month, Date
Time of day
8:30 p.m.
Stated BFRO report #689 · BFRO report, “Time And Conditions” section
Place
Marion County, Oregon
Stated BFRO report #689 · BFRO report, labelled fields: State, County, Location Details
Map point
44.7109, -122.1887 (± 5 km)
Geocoded BFRO report #689 · gnis:1639301 · read with 45% confidence
USGS GNIS reservoir 'Detroit Lake', Marion, matched from place name 'Detroit Lake'
Conflicting value44.9009, -122.5763 (± 31 km)
Geocoded BFRO report #689 · gazetteer:county · read with 30% confidence
Account type
Investigator summary
Derived BFRO report #689 · BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section
Witnesses
3
Stated BFRO report #689 · BFRO report, “Observed” section
Witness was
fishing from a dock
Stated BFRO report #689 · BFRO report, “Observed” section
Witness's word for it
Whatever that thing is
Stated BFRO report #689 · BFRO report, “Observed” section
Source classification
Class B
Stated BFRO report #689 · BFRO classification label

Evidence & investigation

What the source says was found or done. Claimed evidence is listed as claimed; the Anomadex has not examined it.

Photograph

The next day two investigators canvassed the forest near the dock and documented a large ground divot, fresh scat, and a large crushed-fern bed near the abandoned rod-holder.

BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section
Video

The next day two investigators canvassed the forest near the dock and documented a large ground divot, fresh scat, and a large crushed-fern bed near the abandoned rod-holder.

BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section
Scat

The next day two investigators canvassed the forest near the dock and documented a large ground divot, fresh scat, and a large crushed-fern bed near the abandoned rod-holder.

BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section
Structure

The next day two investigators canvassed the forest near the dock and documented a large ground divot, fresh scat, and a large crushed-fern bed near the abandoned rod-holder.

BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section
Measurement

The next day two investigators canvassed the forest near the dock and documented a large ground divot, fresh scat, and a large crushed-fern bed near the abandoned rod-holder.

BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section
Other

The next day two investigators canvassed the forest near the dock and documented a large ground divot, fresh scat, and a large crushed-fern bed near the abandoned rod-holder.

BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section
Tracks

The next morning the investigators found a series of at least a dozen very deep impressions with over 50-inch stride paralleling a gravel road above the campground.

BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section
Video

The next morning the investigators found a series of at least a dozen very deep impressions with over 50-inch stride paralleling a gravel road above the campground.

BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section
Measurement

The next morning the investigators found a series of at least a dozen very deep impressions with over 50-inch stride paralleling a gravel road above the campground.

BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section
Scat

The collected fecal specimen was stored on ice and sent for scientific analysis of diet, host cells, and parasites.

BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section
Follow-up

An investigator received a distressed voicemail a few hours after the event and arranged to meet the witnesses at the lake the next day.

BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section
Follow-up

The next day two investigators canvassed the forest near the dock and documented a large ground divot, fresh scat, and a large crushed-fern bed near the abandoned rod-holder.

BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section
Follow-up

The next morning the investigators found a series of at least a dozen very deep impressions with over 50-inch stride paralleling a gravel road above the campground.

BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section
Follow-up

The collected fecal specimen was stored on ice and sent for scientific analysis of diet, host cells, and parasites.

BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section

Source timeline

Every record this entry is built from, earliest known first. Records are versioned and never edited in place.

  1. Published 1999-06-21 Retrieved 2026-09-24 Version 1 Hash df6295c20931
    BFRO - Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization

The report refers to

  • “has a history of bigfoot events”
    Not in the Anomadex yet