Class B First-hand BFRO #38061

Photographs taken of a possible trackway on property west of Alpena

11 November 2012 mid morning Alpena, Alpena County, Michigan 1 witness

Account

The witness was walking his large wooded property after fresh snow and found a line of large, flat tracks with no toe marks that continued straight through dense brush. He photographed and measured the prints, later learning neighbors had found similar tracks. Conservation staff who viewed the photos reportedly said they did not match a recognized animal.

Summary drafted by AI from the source report and checked by code before I publish it. The witness's own words remain with the publisher — read the original report .

What was reported

Every kind of observation in the account. Select one to find other encounters with it.

Physical traces

Facts & provenance

Each value names where it came from.

Date
11 November 2012
Stated BFRO report #38061 · BFRO report, labelled fields: Year, Month, Date
Time of day
mid morning
Derived BFRO report #38061 · BFRO report, “Time And Conditions” section · read with 60% confidence
Place
Alpena, Alpena County, Michigan
Stated BFRO report #38061 · BFRO report, labelled fields: State, County, Nearest Town, Nearest Road
Map point
45.0745, -83.4436 (± 15 km)
Geocoded BFRO report #38061 · gazetteer:place · read with 50% confidence
Census 2023 Gazetteer centroid of Alpena city (GEOID 2601740), matched from nearest town 'Alpena'
Account type
First-hand
Stated BFRO report #38061 · BFRO report, “Observed” section
Witnesses
1
Derived BFRO report #38061 · BFRO report, “Observed” section
Witness was
walking property after snowfall
Stated BFRO report #38061 · BFRO report, “Observed” section
Source classification
Class B
Stated BFRO report #38061 · BFRO classification label

Evidence & investigation

What the source says was found or done. Claimed evidence is listed as claimed; the Anomadex has not examined it.

Investigated by
Jim Sherman (BFRO)
Tracks

large flat prints without toe or claw marks in straight line through dense brush

Measurements: 5.5" X 10"

BFRO report, “Observed” section
Photograph

photos of fall and winter trackways

BFRO report, “Observed” section
Measurement

distance from toe to heel between prints in straight trackway

Measurements: 20"

BFRO report, “Observed” section
Photograph

A group of conservation personnel viewed the track photos and said they matched no recognized animal in the state.

BFRO report, “Observed” section
Photograph

An investigator followed up with the witness to discuss stride details, compare with bear tracks, and review photos and measurements.

BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section
Measurement

An investigator followed up with the witness to discuss stride details, compare with bear tracks, and review photos and measurements.

BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section
Tracks

An investigator followed up with the witness to discuss stride details, compare with bear tracks, and review photos and measurements.

BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section
Follow-up

A group of conservation personnel viewed the track photos and said they matched no recognized animal in the state.

BFRO report, “Observed” section
Follow-up

An investigator followed up with the witness to discuss stride details, compare with bear tracks, and review photos and measurements.

BFRO report, “Follow-Up” section

Source timeline

Every record this entry is built from, earliest known first. Records are versioned and never edited in place.

  1. Published 2012-12-06 Retrieved 2026-09-25 Version 1 3 images at source Hash 2f04088333fe
    BFRO - Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization

The report refers to

  • “unidentified incident in the adjacent west county”
    Not in the Anomadex yet